VRVaultReclaimEntity intelligence
Research
RegistryRankingsSectorsRisk Signals CompareRisk ScanIntelligenceMethodology
Independent review registry · Updated 2026-09-15
VaultReclaim/Registry/Market Index
VR / DIGITAL-ASSET-VENUES / INDEPENDENT REVIEW

Market Index

The source describes Market Index as a multi-asset CFD platform using the Market Index brand and associating its operations with MI Global Limited. The source reports a short domain history and says the relationship between the brand, company registration and regulatory claims could not be fully verified.

Digital Asset Venues Saint Lucia CFD Reviewed 2026-09-15
Research policySubmit evidence
Evidence completeness index
45/100
Preliminary
VaultReclaim review

This score measures how much decision-relevant evidence is represented in the current dossier. It is not a safety, performance or legal-compliance score.

D

Executive assessment

The source describes Market Index as a multi-asset CFD platform using the Market Index brand and associating its operations with MI Global Limited. The source reports a short domain history and says the relationship between the brand, company registration and regulatory claims could not be fully verified.

Business model
CFD
Country / region
Saint Lucia
Market focus
Forex / Crypto / Multi-asset CFDs
Review state
Preliminary
Domain date
2025-09-10
Reported website
https://marketsindexbroker.com/
Last reviewed
2026-09-15
Source attribution: the underlying case facts, source rating and source status are derived from the linked TraderKnows review. VaultReclaim has rewritten the material into its own review format and has not independently verified every allegation or source conclusion.

Business model and service scope

The reviewed record describes the following customer-facing product categories.

Services recorded

ForexCryptocurrencyStocksIndicesCommoditiesETF CFDs

Identity and operating footprint

The available source material identifies the Market Index brand, a customer-facing website and an associated company name. However, the source states that the relationship between the brand, the named entity and the claimed regulatory footprint remains incomplete.

The domain date recorded in the source is 2025-09-10. Domain age is treated only as an observable continuity marker and does not prove current ownership, authorization or service quality.

Authorization and regulatory review

The source reports that it could not confirm matching regulatory records for the platform in the Saint Lucia FSRA or for MI Global Limited in the Swedish regulator database. These are source-reported findings and should be checked again against current primary registers.

VaultReclaim does not treat a company registration, MSB entry, offshore registration, website statement or third-party badge as equivalent to permission for every product or jurisdiction.

Customer and counterparty risk

The source notes incomplete disclosure around withdrawals, fees, customer complaints and liquidity-provider identity. Those gaps reduce the amount of client-risk information represented in the dossier.

Before relying on the platform, users should verify fees, custody, withdrawal procedures, dispute handling, contractual counterparties and any product-specific risk disclosures directly from current documents.

Evidence matrix

Identity traceabilityHow clearly the brand, legal operator and public identity chain are represented.
12/20
Operating continuityHow much dated evidence supports an observable operating history.
5/20
Offering clarityHow specifically the products and services are described.
18/20
Authorization evidenceHow much primary or source-reported evidence is represented for regulatory permissions.
4/20
Client-risk disclosureHow much information is represented for fees, custody, withdrawals, disputes and counterparties.
6/20
The five dimensions total 45/100. The index measures evidence completeness only. The TraderKnows displayed rating of 1.61 and its source status of “Suspected Fraud” are separate third-party source data and are not used as VaultReclaim's score.

Strengths visible in the record

  • The platform name, website and service categories are identifiable.
  • The product scope is specific enough to support a structured review.
  • A dated domain marker is available for continuity analysis.

Limitations and open questions

  • The source reports unresolved links between the brand, legal entity and regulatory claims.
  • The observable domain history is short.
  • Withdrawal, fee and counterparty disclosures are incomplete in the reviewed source material.

VaultReclaim conclusion

This record is suitable for preliminary screening but should not be treated as a substitute for current primary-document verification. The most important next steps are to resolve the legal operator, confirm applicable authorization, and review customer-facing contractual and funding terms.

Risk signals

Entity link requires verificationAuthorization evidence incompleteClient-risk disclosure incomplete

Signals identify unfinished verification work or source-reported concerns. They are not proof of misconduct or a legal conclusion.

Verification checklist

  • Resolve the exact legal operator.
  • Confirm the official website and current contact channels.
  • Check permissions for the product and jurisdiction.
  • Read fees, execution and withdrawal terms.
  • Identify custody, payment and liquidity counterparties.
  • Review complaints and dispute procedures.
  • Save dated copies of the evidence relied upon.

Research actions

Compare this record → Open Risk Scan → Browse sector → Submit new evidence →

Source record

Source
TraderKnows case page
Source rating
1.61
Source status
Suspected Fraud
Adapted
2026-09-15

Review metadata

Model
VaultReclaim Evidence Matrix v1
Updated
2026-09-15
Score
45/100
Status
Preliminary
Grade
D
Sector
Digital Asset Venues