Research
Independent review registry · Updated 2026-09-15
VR / DIGITAL-ASSET-VENUES / INDEPENDENT REVIEW

XCharter

The source reviews XCharter as a CFD broker offering cryptocurrency and other derivatives. It says the platform's claimed UK entity and US MSB relationship did not match the public records it checked, and it notes similarities with other high-risk broker websites.

Digital Asset Venues China CFD Reviewed 2026-09-15
Evidence completeness index
37/100
Preliminary
VaultReclaim review

This score measures how much decision-relevant evidence is represented in the current dossier. It is not a safety, performance or legal-compliance score.

D

Executive assessment

The source reviews XCharter as a CFD broker offering cryptocurrency and other derivatives. It says the platform's claimed UK entity and US MSB relationship did not match the public records it checked, and it notes similarities with other high-risk broker websites.

Business model
CFD
Country / region
China
Market focus
Forex / Crypto / Multi-asset CFDs
Review state
Preliminary
Domain date
2024-05-19
Reported website
https://www.xchartfx.com
Last reviewed
2026-09-15
Source attribution: the underlying case facts, source rating and source status are derived from the linked TraderKnows review. VaultReclaim has rewritten the material into its own review format and has not independently verified every allegation or source conclusion.

Business model and service scope

The reviewed record describes the following customer-facing product categories.

Services recorded

StocksFuturesCrude oilGoldCryptocurrenciesForeign exchange

Identity and operating footprint

TraderKnows reports that it could not find an XCharter entity in UK Companies House or the FCA register. The source therefore treats the legal-entity chain as unresolved.

The domain date recorded in the source is 2024-05-19. Domain age is treated only as an observable continuity marker and does not prove current ownership, authorization or service quality.

Authorization and regulatory review

The source says the MSB number displayed by XCharter belonged to a different company. This is a source-attributed claim that should be checked against the current FinCEN record and the platform's latest legal disclosures.

VaultReclaim does not treat a company registration, MSB entry, offshore registration, website statement or third-party badge as equivalent to permission for every product or jurisdiction.

Customer and counterparty risk

The review also notes missing account-condition details and incomplete deposit/withdrawal information.

Before relying on the platform, users should verify fees, custody, withdrawal procedures, dispute handling, contractual counterparties and any product-specific risk disclosures directly from current documents.

Evidence matrix

Identity traceabilityHow clearly the brand, legal operator and public identity chain are represented.
8/20
Operating continuityHow much dated evidence supports an observable operating history.
5/20
Offering clarityHow specifically the products and services are described.
18/20
Authorization evidenceHow much primary or source-reported evidence is represented for regulatory permissions.
2/20
Client-risk disclosureHow much information is represented for fees, custody, withdrawals, disputes and counterparties.
4/20
The five dimensions total 37/100. The index measures evidence completeness only. The TraderKnows displayed rating of 1.26 and its source status of “Suspected Fraud” are separate third-party source data and are not used as VaultReclaim's score.

Strengths visible in the record

  • The product range is clearly categorized.
  • The source identifies specific public records relevant to verification.
  • A dated domain marker is available.

Limitations and open questions

  • The UK legal-entity and FCA footprint were not verified by the source.
  • The source reports a mismatch involving the displayed MSB number.
  • Account and funding terms are incompletely disclosed.

VaultReclaim conclusion

This record is suitable for preliminary screening but should not be treated as a substitute for current primary-document verification. The most important next steps are to resolve the legal operator, confirm applicable authorization, and review customer-facing contractual and funding terms.

Risk signals

Entity registration unresolvedMSB reference disputed by sourceFunding disclosures incomplete

Signals identify unfinished verification work or source-reported concerns. They are not proof of misconduct or a legal conclusion.

Verification checklist

  • Resolve the exact legal operator.
  • Confirm the official website and current contact channels.
  • Check permissions for the product and jurisdiction.
  • Read fees, execution and withdrawal terms.
  • Identify custody, payment and liquidity counterparties.
  • Review complaints and dispute procedures.
  • Save dated copies of the evidence relied upon.

Research actions

Source record

Source
TraderKnows case page
Source rating
1.26
Source status
Suspected Fraud
Adapted
2026-09-15

Review metadata

Model
VaultReclaim Evidence Matrix v1
Updated
2026-09-15
Score
37/100
Status
Preliminary
Grade
D
Sector
Digital Asset Venues